Category: Process Mining & RPA
8 European alternatives to process.science — GDPR-compliant & EU-hosted.
German (Hamburg); process mining extensions for Microsoft Power BI and Qlik Sense, founded in 2019.
What the free assessment does for you
Does your organisation use process.science? Put it in the assessment next to your other software and see within minutes how digitally sovereign your whole stack is.
Free · about three minutes · no account needed
Facts
- Headquarters
- DE (EU)
- Sovereignty model
- Vendor-hosted (EU)
- Category
- Process Mining & RPA
- Type
- Product
- GDPR-compliant
- Yes
- Open-source
- No
- Data hosting
- EU
Sources
This record was checked via the vendor's website and legal notice when it was added on September 20, 2026. Source links have been recorded per record since 20 September 2026.
Compliance evidence
The links below point to the vendor's own public documents. We only record what we found: a missing link means "not found publicly", not "not compliant".
No public compliance evidence has been recorded for this vendor yet. Do you know its DPA or subprocessor list? Something wrong? Suggest a correction
Technical hosting signal
Independently established via a DNS/network lookup (not information from the vendor itself). This shows which network currently serves this vendor's website — often a CDN — so it does not necessarily reflect where the actual service or data is hosted.
- Network
- CLOUDFLARESPECTRUM - Cloudflare London, LLC, US (US)
Provenance:Technically measured
Sovereignty profile of process.science
How this vendor scores on the five dimensions of the Digital Sovereignty Heatmap: 0 is sovereign, 100 is high exposure. These are the same scores the assessment uses.
| Jurisdictional exposure (JES) | Headquartered in the EU: European law applies | 0 |
|---|---|---|
| Data residency (DRS) | EU-only hosting | 0 |
| Cryptographic key sovereignty (CKS) | Key management with a European vendor | 40 |
| Platform lock-in (PLS) | Closed source: switching requires data migration | 60 |
| Source & runtime sovereignty (SRS) | Closed source, runtime with the vendor | 45 |
| Average | 29 |
Why digital sovereignty matters with process.science
process.science is headquartered in DE and therefore falls under European law: the GDPR, NIS2 and the Data Act. No foreign legislation can compel access to your data.
Data is hosted exclusively in the EU, so process.science scores best on data residency.
process.science is closed source and hosted by the vendor. The encryption keys and the runtime sit with the vendor and switching requires data migration. Ask about bring-your-own-key, export options and open standards.
What this means for your organisation depends on your whole stack and context. The free assessment weighs process.science together with your other vendors and gives a total score, a heatmap and the main risk drivers.
Top EU-based & GDPR-compliant alternatives to process.science
The European alternatives to process.science come from our knowledge base of over 3,600 vendors. We only list vendors headquartered in the EU or the EEA; fully European-owned vendors rank before vendors with a foreign owner. For each alternative you see the country, the open-source status and a short description.
- ARIS (Software AG)↗
German; ARIS Process Mining, part of the ARIS suite; ARIS holding company Software GmbH has been owned by America's Silver Lake since 2023.
DE · commercial
- Fluxicon Disco↗
Dutch (Eindhoven); process mining software for professionals, founded in 2009 by TU Eindhoven researchers.
NL · commercial
- GBTEC Work Orchestrator↗
German no-code/low-code workflow-automation platform (Bochum) with RPA integration and BPM.
DE · commercial
Frequently asked questions
What is the best European alternative to process.science?
It depends on your use case. Strong EU alternatives to process.science include ARIS (Software AG), bupaR and Celonis. On this page you can compare 8 EU alternatives by jurisdiction, data residency and open-source status.
Are there open-source alternatives to process.science?
Yes. Open-source EU alternatives to process.science include bupaR. These keep your data fully under your own control and let you self-host if you want to.
Is process.science GDPR-compliant and where is the data hosted?
process.science is headquartered in DE (EU) and hosts data in EU. That makes process.science an EU-sovereign choice in its own right; the EU alternatives on this page are comparable European tools.
Digital sovereignty in Process Mining & RPA
Process Mining & RPA: Process analysis on system logs, process improvement and robotic process automation of administrative tasks. In this category the choice of vendor determines who has legal access to your data, where that data lives and how easily you can switch later.
Also in this category
How sovereign is your whole stack?
Start with process.science and add the rest of your software. You immediately see the score, the heatmap and the European alternatives.
Assess process.science in the free assessment